G. K. Beale said:
- A significant problem with this form of the preterist approach is that it limits most of the book’s prophecies of salvation and judgment to 70 A.D. and asserts that these prophecies reached their climactic fulfillment at that time. Indeed, the prophecies of Daniel 2 and 7 alluded to throughout the Apocalypse foresee a last judgment of the evil nations, not primarily of unbelieving Israel
- preterist interpreters understand the prophecies of final judgment in Revelation to be limited to Israel, whereas Daniel 2 and 7 anticipate a universal judgment. John’s depictions, including his allusions to Daniel, are best interpreted in the same way as Daniel. Consequently, the burden of proof rests on these preterists to provide an exegetical rationale both for exchanging a pagan nation with Israel as the primary object of Daniel’s final judgment and for limiting the last judgment mainly to Israel and not applying it universally
G. K. Beale, The book of Revelation: a commentary on the Greek text, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Carlisle, Cumbria: W.B. Eerdmans; Paternoster Press, 1999), 45.