The author’s Preface.
THE
AUTHOR’S PREFACE.
The following Discourse in intended, not merely as an answer to any particular book written against the doctrine of _Original Sin, _but as a _general defence _of that great important doctrine. Nevertheless, I have in this defence taken notice of the main things said against this doctrine, by such of the more noted opposers of it as I have had opportunity to read: particularly those two late writers, Dr. Turnbull and Dr. Taylor, of Norwich; but especially the latter, in what he has published in those two books of his, the first entitled, The Scripture-Doctrine of Original Sin proposed to free and candid Examination; the other, his _Key to the Apostolic Writings, _with _a Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistle to the _Romans. I have closely attended to Dr. Taylor’s _Piece on Original Sin, _in all its parts, and have endeavored that no one thing there said, of any consequence in this controversy, should pass unnoticed, or that any thing which has the appearance of an argument, in opposition to this doctrine, should be left unanswered. I look on the doctrine as of great importance; which every body will doubtless own it is, if it be true. For, if the case be such indeed, that all mankind are by _nature _in a state of _total ruin, _both with respect to the moral evil of which they are the subjects, and the _afflictive evil _to which they are exposed, the one as the consequence and punishment of the other; then, doubtless, the great _salvation _by christ stands in direct relation to this _ruin, _as the remedy to the disease; and the whole gospel, or doctrine of salvation, must suppose it; and all real belief, or true notion of that gospel, must be built upon it. Therefore, as I think the doctrine is most certainly both true and important, I hope, my attempting a _vindication _of it, will be _candidly _interpreted; and that what I have done towards its defence, will be _impartially _considered, by all that will give themselves the trouble to read the ensuing discourse; in which it is designed to examine every thing material throughout the Doctor’s _whole _book, and many things in that other book, containing his Key and Exposition on Romans; as also many things written in opposition to this doctrine by some other modern authors. Moreover, my discourse being not only intended for an _answer _to Dr. Taylor, and other opposers of the doctrine of original sin, but for a _general defence _of that doctrine; producing the _evidence _of the truth of the doctrine, as well as answering _objections _made against it; I hope this attempt of mine will not be thought needless, nor be altogether useless, notwithstanding other publications on the subject.
I would also hope, that the _extensiveness _of the plan of the following treatise will excuse the _length _of it. And that when it is considered, how _much _was absolutely requisite to the full executing of a design formed on such a plan; how much has been written _against _the doctrine of original sin, and with what plausibility; how strong the _prejudices _of many are in favour of what is said in _opposition _to this doctrine—and that it cannot be expected, any thing short of a full consideration of almost _every _argument advanced by the main opposers, especially by this late and specious writer, Dr. Taylor, will satisfy many readers—how much must unavoidably be said in order to a full handling of the arguments in _defence _of the doctrine; and how _important _the doctrine must be, if true; I trust, the length of the following discourse will not be thought to exceed what the case really required. However, this must be left to the judgment of the intelligent and candid reader.
_Stockbridge, May 26, 1757. _
Note:—When the page is referred to in this manner, p. 40. p. 50. without mentioning the book, thereby is to be understood such a page in Dr. Taylor’s _Scripture-Doctrine of Original Sin. _S. intends the Supplement. When the word Key is used to signify the book referred to, thereby is to be understood Dr. Taylor’s KEY to the Apostolic Writings. This mark [§] with figures or a number annexed, signifies such a section or paragraph in his Key. When after mentioning Preface to Par. on Epist. to Romans, there is subjoined p. 145. 47. or the like, thereby is intended page and paragraph, page 145, paragraph 47. The letter T. alone, is used to signify Dr. Taylor’s name, and no other.